|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
21/11/2022 |
Actualizado : |
21/11/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
Autor : |
FEDERICI, M.; RIGAMONTI, N.; ROVIRA, P.J.; TORRES, P.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; FERRARI, G.; SIMÓN, C.; AUBRIOT, L.; CIGANDA, V. |
Afiliación : |
MARIA TERESA FEDERICI RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; NATALIA RIGAMONTI, Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay- LATU, Uruguay; PABLO JUAN ROVIRA SANZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO ANDRES TORRES ASTETE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SOFÍA MARTÍNEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GRACIELA FERRARI, Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay- LATU, Uruguay; CLAUDIA SIMÓN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUIS AUBRIOT, Universidad de la República - Uruguay; VERONICA SOLANGE CIGANDA BRASCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Aplicación de técnicas clásicas de microscopía y basadas en ADN para el análisis de las comunidades de microorganismos y cianobacterias del sedimento en el Embalse Rincón del Bonete - Uruguay. [resumen]. |
Complemento del título : |
APLICACIÓN DE TÉCNICAS CLÁSICAS DE MICROSCOPÍA Y
BASADAS EN ADN PARA EL ANÁLISIS DE LAS COMUNIDADES DE MICROORGANISMOS Y CIANOBACTERIAS DEL SEDIMENTO EN EL EMBALSE RINCÓN DEL BONETE- URUGUAY |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: REDBIO México 2022, XI Congreso, "Biotecnología productiva y sostenible". Libro de resúmenes. 12-14 octubre 2022, Yucatán, México. p.127. |
Idioma : |
Español |
Notas : |
Agradecimientos: A los Institutos INIA y LATU con sus respectivas autoridades por la cofinanciación del Proyecto: "Desarrollo y Aplicación de nuevas herramientas moleculares y espectrales para el estudio de las comunidades de cianobacterias en aguas continentales: estudio de caso Embalse Rincón del Bonete", proyecto marco del trabajo aquí presentado. |
Contenido : |
El objetivo de este trabajo fue el estudio de las poblaciones de cianobacterias y microrganismos asociados al sedimento utilizando 3 metodologías distintas: microscopía óptica, secuenciación del gen 16S ARNr, y qPCR. |
Palabras claves : |
ARNr; QPCR. |
Thesagro : |
CIANOBACTERIAS. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16869/1/Federici-MT.-REDBIO-Mexico-2022.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01479nam a2200253 a 4500 001 1063771 005 2022-11-21 008 2022 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aFEDERICI, M. 245 $aAplicación de técnicas clásicas de microscopía y basadas en ADN para el análisis de las comunidades de microorganismos y cianobacterias del sedimento en el Embalse Rincón del Bonete - Uruguay. [resumen].$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: REDBIO México 2022, XI Congreso, "Biotecnología productiva y sostenible". Libro de resúmenes. 12-14 octubre 2022, Yucatán, México. p.127.$c2022 500 $aAgradecimientos: A los Institutos INIA y LATU con sus respectivas autoridades por la cofinanciación del Proyecto: "Desarrollo y Aplicación de nuevas herramientas moleculares y espectrales para el estudio de las comunidades de cianobacterias en aguas continentales: estudio de caso Embalse Rincón del Bonete", proyecto marco del trabajo aquí presentado. 520 $aEl objetivo de este trabajo fue el estudio de las poblaciones de cianobacterias y microrganismos asociados al sedimento utilizando 3 metodologías distintas: microscopía óptica, secuenciación del gen 16S ARNr, y qPCR. 650 $aCIANOBACTERIAS 653 $aARNr 653 $aQPCR 700 1 $aRIGAMONTI, N. 700 1 $aROVIRA, P.J. 700 1 $aTORRES, P. 700 1 $aMARTÍNEZ, S. 700 1 $aFERRARI, G. 700 1 $aSIMÓN, C. 700 1 $aAUBRIOT, L. 700 1 $aCIGANDA, V.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
16/10/2018 |
Actualizado : |
11/02/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
BORGES, A.; GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A.; ERNST, O.; CADENAZZI, M.; TERRA, J.A.; GUTIÉRREZ, L. |
Afiliación : |
ALEJANDRA BORGES, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; AGUSTÍN GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; OSVALDO, ERNST, Departamento de Producción de Cultivos. EEMAC, Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; MÓNICA CADENAZZI, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin. |
Título : |
Can spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments? |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Crop Science, 2018, v. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10. |
DOI : |
10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018. |
Contenido : |
Abstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design. MenosAbstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitut... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
EFFICIENCY STATISTICS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FIELD VARIABILITY; SPATIAL MODELS; UNIFORMITY TRIAL. |
Thesagro : |
DISENO ESTADISTICO; DISENO EXPERIMENTAL; MODELOS ESTADISTICOS; VARIABILIDAD. |
Asunto categoría : |
U30 Métodos de investigación |
Marc : |
LEADER 02512naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1059193 005 2019-02-11 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177$2DOI 100 1 $aBORGES, A. 245 $aCan spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments?$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 500 $aArticle history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018. 520 $aAbstract: One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design. 650 $aDISENO ESTADISTICO 650 $aDISENO EXPERIMENTAL 650 $aMODELOS ESTADISTICOS 650 $aVARIABILIDAD 653 $aEFFICIENCY STATISTICS 653 $aEXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 653 $aFIELD VARIABILITY 653 $aSPATIAL MODELS 653 $aUNIFORMITY TRIAL 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A. 700 1 $aERNST, O. 700 1 $aCADENAZZI, M. 700 1 $aTERRA, J.A. 700 1 $aGUTIÉRREZ, L. 773 $tCrop Science, 2018$gv. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|